-
@phatal187 @SemiNewsByDylan Looking at Wikichip, AnandTech got the power wrong by 3x. Should have been 7.5 watts. BZM was indeed 55 J/TH. fuse.wikichip.org/news/6603/intel-unveils-bonanzamine-a-bitcoin-accelerator-asic/
-
@phatal187 @SemiNewsByDylan However, BZM2 is vastly more efficient actually. This is from GRIID. This shows 26 J/TH. tomshardware.com/news/intels-second-gen-bitcoin-miners-performance-and-pricing-listed
Redfire75369’s Twitter Archive—№ 2,714