Redfire75369’s Twitter Archive—№ 2,448

@phatal187 I found a plausible explanation in the comments. > 55J/TH is wrong, I believe Intel screwed up and wanted to say 55GH/J instead. Which actually fits the performance numbers (137/2.5 = 54.8). This ends up being 18.2W/TH = more efficient than anything else in the table.