-
Permalink
On twitter.com
Mention
♻️ 2 Retweets
❤️ 11 Favorites
Mood +3 🙂
-
Summary here if people want: Monet is 2022/2023 Future of Radeon with multiple architectures for different markets Granite Rapids is not the craziest thing Intel is working on Granite Rapids could be 2024 due to overambitionPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 3 Favorites
Mood -1 🙁
-
Intel Testimonials: 1. Pat likes winning, and he likes winning by double digits 2. Overambition in engineering, combined with a lack of leadership and communication from upper management.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 3 Favorites
Mood +11 🙂
-
3. Engineers shot for the moon with insane IPC targets and ambitious node shrinks, which were arguably entirely unrealistic to accomplish without delays.On twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood +2 🙂
-
4. Idea that noone could catch up to them even if their engineering failed "Certainly not AMD, and TSMC was effectively multiple nodes behind us". Their ego not being reigned in, and dishonesty about things going wrong, let AMD catch up and take the lead.Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 1 Retweets
❤️ 3 Favorites
Mood -2 🙁
-
5. Pat understands achievability, and what is worth focusing on. He has rejected many "moonshot" architectures, saying that big performance increases in some metrics shouldn't come at the loss of other metrics or features.... (1/2)Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood -1 🙁
-
5 (Continued). 2023 onwards contains radical stuff that has been reigned in by Pat Gelsinger to prevent delays, and remain competitive. (2/2)Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 3 Favorites
Mood +1 🙂
-
Intel has greater IPC uplifts planned than Excavator to Zen(??????, that's 52%-ish) AMD Middle Management expect performance crowns to swap occasionally after 2021 MLID believes neither Intel nor AMD can attain "unquestioned leadership" by 2025Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 3 Favorites
Mood +4 🙂
